= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Jonathan_Graehl comments on Exterminating life is rational - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (272)
In saying "our compression of subjective time can be exponential", do you actually mean that the compression rate may keep growing exponentially as a function of real time?
"if your utility is at risk of going negative; it's not possible that you would not accept a .999% risk". I assume you mean that if my utility is around 0, and things are trending toward worse, I should be happy to accept a 99.9% chance of destroying the universe (assuming I'm the .1% possibility gives me some improvement).
"Is life barely worth living? Buy a lottery ticket, and if you don't win, kill yourself - you win either way!" - probably not the best marketing campaign for the state-run lottery.
Look at where the semicolon is. You've combined the end of one clause with the beginning of a different clause.
I wrote a post on that..