CannibalSmith comments on The Aumann's agreement theorem game (guess 2/3 of the average) - Less Wrong

15 [deleted] 09 June 2009 07:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (149)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CannibalSmith 09 June 2009 12:59:55PM *  1 point [-]

Okay.

You will pick X - a number whose value I don't know. I know that, so I'll pick X*2/3. You know that I know that, so you'll pick X*4/9 instead. But I know that you know that I know that, so I'll pick X*8/27 instead. But you know that I know that you know that I know that, so you'll pick X*16/81 instead. But I know-

This continues to infinity until X is multiplied by 0. At this point the value of X doesn't matter.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 09 June 2009 01:45:47PM *  0 points [-]

Nope, it's the same argument. You can't know that I pick X and at the same time know that I pick X*4/9 instead. From the outset, you can't assume to know precisely what I pick, and considering all possible values that I pick and you know I pick (a set of situations indexed by X) doesn't fix that.