thomblake comments on Let's reimplement EURISKO! - Less Wrong

19 Post author: cousin_it 11 June 2009 04:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (151)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: thomblake 11 June 2009 04:55:50PM 4 points [-]

I've always been more suspicious it's a 'mechanical turk' than a 'clever hans'.

How could he not make the source code public? Who does he think he is, Microsoft?

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 12 June 2009 12:49:33AM 1 point [-]

Modern "AI" research programs tend to develop relatively simple "training wheels" tasks with objectively measurable and reproducible performance. But you have at least the trappings of science. The same can't be said for most early AI work.

If there really isn't enough information in his papers to reproduce his result (I have not read them), then Lenat has to at least be suspected of painting an overly rosy picture of how awesome his creation was.

If the result is just "this is cool", then a public binary, web service, or source code release would be welcome.

Comment author: Houshalter 25 April 2013 05:33:31AM 0 points [-]

Well winning the traveler tournament and designing circuits is a bit too much for just a person. Eurisko had to have done something, even if it had help or it's abilities were exaggerated. I think it's unlikely it didn't exist at all or was totally faked.

My guess is he exaggerated what it was capable of. It's also possible it really did work and he planned on capitalizing on it. Or maybe he was legitimately scared of it falling into the wrong hands and becoming unfriendly AI.