= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Jonathan_Graehl comments on Let's reimplement EURISKO! - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (151)
I've always been more suspicious it's a 'mechanical turk' than a 'clever hans'.
How could he not make the source code public? Who does he think he is, Microsoft?
Modern "AI" research programs tend to develop relatively simple "training wheels" tasks with objectively measurable and reproducible performance. But you have at least the trappings of science. The same can't be said for most early AI work.
If there really isn't enough information in his papers to reproduce his result (I have not read them), then Lenat has to at least be suspected of painting an overly rosy picture of how awesome his creation was.
If the result is just "this is cool", then a public binary, web service, or source code release would be welcome.