= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
lavalamp comments on Intelligence enhancement as existential risk mitigation - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (198)
Why is that? Of course we all know that the average IQ can't be 10 points higher than the average IQ, but that would be a silly way to interpret what he said, and I can't think of any mathematical reason why the new average couldn't become, say, 110 instead of 100... (I can think of lots of practical reasons, though) (EDIT: and of course I mean on today's scale, as others have pointed out)