= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
thomblake comments on Intelligence enhancement as existential risk mitigation - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (198)
Was the massive downvote here because I didn't include enough information about how this is mathematically impossible, or because people don't agree that one should speak with precision, or because people don't like me pointing out that one should speak with precision?
Technically, you didn't point out that one should speak with precision. Therefore, your entire question is indecipherable gibberish.
I didn't downvote you, but my guess is that you were perceived to be impolite about your failure (deliberate or inadvertent) to get the point of the original remark. Neither missing the point nor being impolite tend to be looked on favorably.