asciilifeform comments on Why safety is not safe - Less Wrong

48 Post author: rwallace 14 June 2009 05:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (97)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: asciilifeform 14 June 2009 11:23:06PM -2 points [-]

the fact that a decent FAI researcher would tend not to publicly announce any advancements in AGI research

Science as priestcraft: a historic dead end, the Pythagoreans and the few genuine finds of the alchemists nonwithstanding. I am astounded by the arrogance of people who consider themselves worthy of membership in such a secret club, believing themselves more qualified than "the rabble" to decide the fate of all mankind.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 14 June 2009 11:41:04PM *  1 point [-]

This argument mixes up the question of factual utilitarian efficiency of science, claim for overconfidence in science's efficiency, and moral judgment about breaking the egalitarian attitude based on said confidence in efficiency. Also, the argument is for some reason about science in general, and not just the controversial claim about hypothetical FAI researchers.

Comment author: MugaSofer 25 April 2013 01:28:43PM -1 points [-]

Science as priestcraft: a historic dead end

Name three.

Not being rhetorical, genuinely curious here.