Please see this previous comment of mine.

The point here is that it "1+1=2" should not be taken as a statement about physical reality, unless and until we have agreed (explicitly!) on a specific model of the world -- that is, a specific physical interpretation of those mathematical terms. If that model later turns out not to correspond to reality, that's what we say; we don't say that the mathematics was incorrect.

Thus, examples of things not to say:

• "Relativity disproves Euclidean geometry."

• "Quantum mechanics disproves classical logic"

• "I am an infinite set atheist - have you ever actually seen an infinite set?"