Cyan comments on Guilt by Association - Less Wrong

1 Post author: Annoyance 24 June 2009 05:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Cyan 25 June 2009 05:32:38PM *  1 point [-]

I don't infer doctors' actual performances from their responses to a word problem, so I'm not that scared. I don't think byrnema was wrong to claim that

A doctor who frequently gives mammograms would certainly learn over time that most women who have a positive result don't have breast cancer.

Comment author: SilasBarta 26 June 2009 08:47:09PM *  2 points [-]

Er, the whole point of statistical inference (and intelligence more generally) is that you can get the most knowledge from the least data. In other words, so you can figure stuff out before learning it "the hard way". If doctors "eventually figure out" that most positives don't actually mean cancer, that means poor performance (judged against professionals in general), not good performance!

Comment author: Cyan 26 June 2009 09:07:54PM 0 points [-]

"Eventually" was byrnema's usage -- I'd bet doctors are probably told outright the positive and negative predictive values of the tests by the test designers.