army1987 comments on The Domain of Your Utility Function - Less Wrong

24 Post author: Peter_de_Blanc 23 June 2009 04:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 16 November 2011 12:25:30PM *  4 points [-]

"Would you kill someone for $100, if after killing them I could drug/hypnotize you so that you won't remember, and you'll never be able to find out?" You'd likely answer "yes" if your utility function is PD and "no" otherwise.

Comment author: wedrifid 16 November 2011 03:21:41PM *  2 points [-]

It is a rare person indeed who would answer 'yes' to that question (without being frivolous). It implies valuing signalling honesty more than signalling not-planning-to-kill-folks. MoR!Quirrel might, depending on who he was talking to.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 16 November 2011 04:10:50PM 2 points [-]

I know a lot of people who I expect would answer 'yes' for a hundred thousand dollars when talking to me -- maybe with a "depends on the person" caveat. A few for $1000. But $100? Yeah, not very many.

I suspect that threshold has more to do with the average level of wealth of my cohort than with our willingness to signal honesty.

Comment author: wedrifid 16 November 2011 04:15:33PM 4 points [-]

A hundred thousand is a lot of money! I deserve lots of trite costless signalling points for saying I wouldn't accept that offer. I'm holding out for a mil. Or at least a half! ;)

Comment author: [deleted] 16 November 2011 09:05:17PM 0 points [-]

I suspect that threshold has more to do with the average level of wealth of my cohort than with our willingness to signal honesty.

I would simply not trust the person making the offer for 100$. How do they make the consequences go away? Surely that costs at least a few thousand, assuming we're in a stable country. So why pay me so little? Besides the risk though, I don't see why murder should be expensive. It's not exactly complicated, assuming an unsuspecting civilian target. 100$ seems like a reasonable sum for the amount of work.

Comment author: Benito 20 May 2014 10:13:16PM 1 point [-]

I don't know that MoR!Quirrell would care about the memory wipe at all. Money is money.

Comment author: [deleted] 16 November 2011 05:30:29PM *  0 points [-]

I hadn't considered the possibility of lying. Make that “You likely would do that if ..., and you likely wouldn't otherwise.” Also, the amount of money and/or the number of people killed can be raised as needed for rich people/people who could kill one person for money anyway.

Comment author: wedrifid 16 November 2011 05:36:01PM 2 points [-]

(I would also usually specify "and there are no other consequences to you" as well given that most of the reason not to kill people is practical.)