Vladimir_Nesov comments on Controlling your inner control circuits - Less Wrong

45 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 26 June 2009 05:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (146)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 04 July 2009 04:22:35PM *  3 points [-]

Actually, I suspect that this is not only wrong, but terribly wrong. I might be wrong

You are wrong. The above is a myth promoted by the Culture of Chaos and the popular media. Advanced modern robots use advanced modern theory - e.g. particle filters to integrate multiple sensory streams to localize the robot (a Bayesian method).

Comment author: Technologos 04 July 2009 05:00:41PM 1 point [-]

And this is even more true when considering elements in the formation of a robot that need to be handled before the AI: physics, metallurgy, engineering, computer hardware design, etc.

Without theory--good, workably-correct theory--the search space for innovations is just too large. The more correct the theory, the less space has to be searched for solution concepts. If you're going to build a rocket, you sure as hell better understand Newton's laws. But things will go much smoother if you also know some chemistry, some material science, and some computer science.

For a solid example of theory taking previous experimental data and massively narrowing the search space, see RAND's first report on the feasibility of satellites here.