Yvain comments on What's In A Name? - Less Wrong

41 Post author: Yvain 29 June 2009 12:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (132)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alicorn 29 June 2009 03:50:02PM 7 points [-]

A lot of relatively weighty decisions wind up being made for trivial reasons simply because all of the non-trivial factors cancel each other out - for instance, if I were trying to decide whether to go into ethics or metaphysics (a choice with long-term career impact, assuming I get to be a professor one day) and I didn't find myself strongly preferring one over the other, I could see myself picking one for a silly reason. If my name were Ethel, which it is not, and I liked the sound of "Ethel the ethicist", that might tip the balance. Either that, or contemplating that choice would throw into sharp relief something I'd been overlooking in favor of metaphysics. But if there is no such factor, then why not choose on the basis of "Ethel the ethicist" sounding nice? It arguably makes slightly more sense than flipping a coin.

Comment author: Yvain 30 June 2009 10:25:02AM 2 points [-]

If you haven't already, read the part of the paper where they talk about hardware and roofing stores. They ran some clever analyses to see whether the effect was caused by a love of alliteration (for example someone named Herman decides to go into hardware so he can call his store Herman's Hardware) and the results suggested this wasn't the explanation.