Alicorn comments on What's In A Name? - Less Wrong

41 Post author: Yvain 29 June 2009 12:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (132)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alicorn 30 June 2009 04:01:05PM 1 point [-]

Darn, does that rule out "Joyce" too because that refers to the abstract concept of joy? Or is that okay if I want my child to be joyous? What can I name my kids without having them messed up?

Comment author: JamesAndrix 30 June 2009 05:49:49PM 1 point [-]

I think saying "I am Joyce" all the time wouldn't have nearly the impact that saying "I am Joy" would.

Comment author: thomblake 30 June 2009 04:14:34PM -1 points [-]

The trick is, don't think of it as being 'messed up'. There are a lot of different ways of being that are just fine.

One of my children will be named after Alexander the Great and Lex Luthor. I will be teaching her Aristotelian ethics, and I have a strong suspicion she will be told she's a god by her mother.

Comment author: JamesAndrix 30 June 2009 06:09:55PM 0 points [-]

Well, it may depend on where the person would otherwise be psychologically. I think there are ways of being that are messed up, and the wrong name can at least make that worse. It may be that only a small percentage of "Joy"s would be psychologically harmed.

If a name is the worst mistake a parent makes, then the kid will probably be fine anyway.