= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ehird comments on Open Thread: July 2009 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (235)
It looks cheesy, but I've heard quite a few people like it, and I've read some interesting posts on his blog.
I read the blog, which is good in parts, but I've never found the forums worth the time.
After seeing:
I'm gonna recant my previous post. Not worth your time (and when did dreaming and lucid dreaming become "paranormal"?).
Edit:
Sheesh, half of these forums are the same thing.
Association fallacy. Just because the forums contain sections abhorrent to you, doesn't mean other sections are just as bad. Also, 3 of 17 is hardly half.
Are you suggesting it does not paint something about the general reliability of the community? I think this is silly.
Sure it is, modulo hyperbole :-)
Yes. I'm saying that those forums are quite large, and people who post in one section are unlikely to post in other sections. We can rely on, say, people in tech section to know tech.
True; the largeness is a factor.