= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Lawliet comments on Recommended reading for new rationalists - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (158)
One of my favorite books, but do you think it's appropriate for this list?
Not sure what exactly should count as appropriate, I had assumed that the votes would sort the good from the bad, but maybe people would be less inclined to downvote a book they liked, which could be a problem with a well-liked book.
Is it enough that these comments could serve as a warning, or do you suggest I delete/edit the post?
Yeah, I was thinking that it could turn into a popularity contest. There's certainly no way I would ever downvote this book.
Instead of deleting it, why don't you make a case for its inclusion? Vladmir's off to a good start.