= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Alicorn comments on Our society lacks good self-preservation mechanisms - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (105)
It's hardly without precedent to give people backup plans for what to do if they break rules:
"Don't you dare go to a party where there is any alcohol, young lady! But if you do, and you get drunk, for the love of God call me and I'll pick you up, don't drive!"
"Do not do anything that would cause you to get set on fire. If you do, stop, drop, and roll."
"Don't wear socks with sandals. But if you must, at least have them be short socks, not knee-length jobs in a heavy fabric."
"Don't drink the water there - if you do, boil it first."
But the Church expects people to be perfect, and isn't particularly concerned about minimizing harm in the case that you break the rules. Picture this conversation:
"Don't have sex before marriage, and don't use condoms"
"Okay, no sex before marriage. But what if I do, then should I use a condom?"
"What do you mean, what if I do? Don't do it at all. Have zero sex before marriage. Also, don't use condoms. It's simple."
"Oh, okay. So avoid having sex before marriage, and if I do have sex before marriage, then I shouldn't use a condom."
...
The sorts of rules you cite make sense when you're trying to minimize physical harms. When your job is protecting the immortal souls of people, that's a secondary concern at best.
"Don't do something that damns your immortal soul to an eternity of torment. But if you do, make sure you wear a sweater" makes about as much sense in this context.