Wei_Dai comments on Fair Division of Black-Hole Negentropy: an Introduction to Cooperative Game Theory - Less Wrong

26 Post author: Wei_Dai 16 July 2009 04:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 16 July 2009 07:58:45AM 1 point [-]

I assume that the reader is already familiar with "non-cooperative game theory". It's what everyone already knows, usually just by the name "game theory". The typical definition of "cooperative game theory" isn't very helpful for understanding the difference between the two, which is why I'm providing an example instead.

But here's Wikipedia's definition of "cooperative game":

A cooperative game is a game where groups of players ("coalitions") may enforce cooperative behaviour, hence the game is a competition between coalitions of players, rather than between individual players. An example is a coordination game, when players choose the strategies by a consensus decision-making process.

Comment author: timtyler 16 July 2009 05:35:48PM 1 point [-]

A single example alone doesn't usually do much to deliniate the set it is part of.

If I show you something from my bag, that doesn't give you much of a clue what else is in it.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 December 2009 06:31:07AM *  0 points [-]

The example given here gives me the impressions that 'cooperative game theory' is just non-cooperative game theory where each agent is a coalition rather than an individual. Unless this is the intended meaning I suggest the definition is misleading.