Wei_Dai comments on The Popularization Bias - Less Wrong

21 Post author: Wei_Dai 17 July 2009 03:43PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 30 July 2009 10:19:05PM 2 points [-]

The Theory of Bayesian Aggregation - Bayesian Group Agents and Two Modes of Aggregation by Mathias Risse.

ABSTRACT: Suppose we have a group of Bayesian agents, and suppose that they would like for their group as a whole to be a Bayesian agent as well. Moreover, suppose that those agents want the probabilities and utilities attached to this group agent to be aggregated from the individual probabilities and utilities in reasonable ways. Two ways of aggregating their individual data are available to them, viz., ex ante aggregation and ex post aggregation. The former aggregates expected utilities directly, whereas the latter aggregates probabilities and utilities separately. A number of recent formal results show that both approaches have problematic implications. This study discusses the philosophical issues arising from those results. In this process, I hope to convince the reader that these results about Bayesian aggregation are highly significant to decision theorists, but also of immense interest to theorists working in areas such as ethics and political philosophy.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 31 July 2009 03:24:35PM *  0 points [-]

Wasn't as enlightening as the abstract made it sound.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 01 August 2009 02:08:36AM 0 points [-]

The results seem quite significant, even if it's not clear what they mean. One possible interpretation is that expected utility maximization is not the correct ideal for group rationality.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 01 August 2009 02:20:32AM 0 points [-]

Or they just do it totally wrong.