Douglas_Knight comments on Sayeth the Girl - Less Wrong

47 Post author: Alicorn 19 July 2009 10:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (486)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: G_Ruby 22 July 2009 02:30:42AM *  1 point [-]

Hello,

Utilitarian theory is the sociological and philosophical theory that all people desire and strive for whatever they perceive to lead to their happiness.

Reciprocal utilitarianism is a theory of social interaction in which you assist others in achieving what they perceive to lead to happiness in the hopes that they may assist you in the same in the near future.

My main focus when interacting with anyone is to ascertain whether they are generally counter-reciprocal or preemptively-reciprocal, honest, trustworthy, reliable and congenial.

In most situations, if these people don't meet these qualities to my satisfaction, I still try to maintain a higher but minimum level in parallel to them to maintain good standing "just in case".

If a person does reciprocate and meet these desirable qualities to my satisfaction, I try to meet or exceed their level of positive return in praise, loyalty or material wealth.

So in answer to your question: Yes, I value how people respond to my actions. In fact, the continuous building of good relations and reciprocity [or the disassociation of myself with undesirable and unreliable people] is the cornerstone of my social life; Not because I believe it is unselfish, but because living in a selfish but 'ethical' manner has worked for me.

[Note: Again, I apologize for the ranting style of this post. I believe that we may have misinterpreted the contents of each other's original posts, but I am enjoying this tangent.]

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 22 July 2009 03:41:40AM *  2 points [-]

You mean reciprocal altruism. "Sociobiology" was a dead give-away.

Comment author: G_Ruby 22 July 2009 03:46:42AM 1 point [-]

Hello,

Yes! That's the concept! Thank you!

If possible, I would like to apologize for misusing the concept of "utilitarianism" for what should have been "reciprocal altruism".

For the sake of the discussion, please assume that my original comments have been amended to reflect this.

Comment author: thomblake 22 July 2009 03:50:49AM 2 points [-]

Not to worry. When I started around these folks, I was mistaking their use of "altruism" for what we call "altruism" in ethics, which is a different animal entirely. That's one reason we try not to argue too hard about mere definitions.

Comment author: G_Ruby 22 July 2009 03:55:19AM 2 points [-]

Hello,

Aye, thank you.

It is a comfort to me to know I can have my misconceptions knocked out of me in a gentle and civil way here.

I think I'll enjoy learning from this community.