Warrigal comments on Joint Distributions and the Slow Spread of Good Ideas - Less Wrong

13 Post author: David_J_Balan 20 July 2009 11:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (19)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: scav 21 July 2009 11:42:39AM 7 points [-]

But House's "rationally correct" courses of action are only eventually proven so with hindsight. They often involve harsh experiments that directly endanger the patient, and each episode generally includes at least 2 dangerous false diagnoses for dramatic effect.

In real life, House would by now have killed an unacceptable proportion of his patients and got himself fired and sued. I love the series, so I don't mind suspending disbelief about that.

You should be able to make a correct but unexpected decision without being branded a maverick - sometimes. To be a successful maverick your correct decisions have to be unexpected most of the time. But then those around you who supposedly know the subject would have to be badly miscalibrated...

Comment author: [deleted] 21 July 2009 06:20:25PM 0 points [-]

The specific example I had in mind was in the episode "Son of Coma Guy", in which a father, who is going to fall into a coma for the rest of his life, can save his son's life with a heart transplant, and decides he'd rather die to save his son's life than live in a coma while his son dies. House would like to proceed with the transplant, but Cuddy refuses.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 21 August 2011 11:57:12PM 0 points [-]

That seems closer to shut up and multiply.