Raka comments on Being saner about gender and rationality - Less Wrong

14 [deleted] 20 July 2009 07:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (84)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Raka 20 July 2009 12:36:42PM 3 points [-]

Hi, I'm a new user who just discovered Less Wrong. I just wanted to post and say how excited I am to join this amazing and unfamiliar community!

Comment author: AndyWood 20 July 2009 07:23:59PM 9 points [-]

I sit in absolute awe of the epic lack of sense of humor in the replies to this.

Comment author: RobinZ 20 July 2009 07:55:22PM 0 points [-]

...!

*laughs*

Comment author: RichardKennaway 20 July 2009 02:34:25PM *  0 points [-]

Some possible interpretations of Raka's comment:

  1. Raka is Roko, and is lying.

  2. Raka is some other established reader of LW, and is lying.

  3. Raka is a bystander who has been recruited by a regular to join and post that comment.

  4. Raka is a new user who just discovered Less Wrong, and just wanted to post and say how excited they are to join, and just happened to choose a username very like Roko's, and post at a point in the discussion where questions of identity had been raised.

I can't decide between the first three, but the least credible hypothesis is 4.

Please don't piss in the soup Raka, whoever you are.

ETA: As it happens, I have used the name "Raak" elsewhere on the web for many years, but I am not Roko or Raka, and have never posted and never will post here by any name but my everyday one.

Comment author: ciphergoth 20 July 2009 05:29:31PM 6 points [-]

I'm pretty sure it's

  • Raka is some other established reader of LW, and is making a point

though I'm not sure I know exactly what the point is - perhaps that Roko is unlikely to succeed in their disguise, or that we're going to start thinking every newcomer is Roko if this sort of thing goes on.

Comment author: JulianMorrison 20 July 2009 02:44:21PM 0 points [-]

The most credible is 1. Placement, Hamming distance, a publicly stated intent to do as much, and a wierdly content-free intro message.

I don't see what Roko gains from this.

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 20 July 2009 05:31:26PM 5 points [-]

I really don't think he would fail that badly at disguise.

Comment author: bogus 20 July 2009 02:58:25PM 1 point [-]

Hi, Raka, and welcome to Less Wrong!

I can tell you've been lurking for a while and have a well-developed sense of humor. These are well-appreciated qualities in our community, but do not overdo it: being overly trollish is discouraged here. Have fun!