Vladimir_Nesov comments on Being saner about gender and rationality - Less Wrong

14 [deleted] 20 July 2009 07:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (84)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pjeby 20 July 2009 04:26:08PM 13 points [-]

I would also recommend that anyone who feels that they have played a particularly large part in the debate on either side do the same, for example PJeby.

I almost did that yesterday, but realized that there's no way I wouldn't be recognizable.

However, I will dispute your implication that I'm a "masculinist" - I'm merely against the idea that anyone has a "right" over the thoughts of others, or a right to not have their feelings hurt.... especially in a forum whose purpose is to help people get over their irrationality. Here, we should be talking about how to disconnect our buttons, rather than how to insist that other people stop pushing them.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 20 July 2009 04:33:49PM *  -2 points [-]

This is incorrect. You are not supposed to turn insensitive to your own preferences.

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 20 July 2009 05:27:59PM 1 point [-]

It sounds to me like pjeby is talking about knee-jerk emotional reactions, not preferences.

Comment author: pjeby 20 July 2009 05:52:38PM 3 points [-]

It sounds to me like pjeby is talking about knee-jerk emotional reactions, not preferences.

Correct. At least in my usage of language, a "preference" is something that you don't feel "bad" about when it's not met; you merely feel an absence of "good".

IOW, it's bad enough that your preference isn't met, without feeling bad on top of it.