goldfishlaser comments on Are you crazy? - Less Wrong

2 Post author: gworley 20 July 2009 04:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 July 2009 10:58:34PM 3 points [-]

Not sure if I should argue about sanity with someone who's name is Dagon. ;-)

Tabooing sane, I get "free from behaviors outlined in psychology books as insane". Is that against the rules of taboo, to use insane?

It seems to me that while there is a fuzzy line when we are trying to conceive of sanity/insanity, in the end it is socially decided upon, and I defer to the experts unless I have cause not to.

Comment author: thomblake 20 July 2009 11:25:34PM 1 point [-]

free from behaviors outlined in psychology books as insane

It seems to me that in defining it that way, you've removed the motivation for being concerned about whether oneself is insane.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 July 2009 11:29:56PM *  1 point [-]

Not necessarily. Ever seen the movie "A Beautiful Mind"? He had no idea his family and friends were figments of a schizophrenic imagination. Just reading about it in a textbook wouldn't have solved his problem, since he had not yet received any information persuading him that anything was fishy.

Edit: But my definition does change how one would go through evaluating whether one was insane. They'd read a book and do what they could to detect anything tricky, like anosognosia or schitzophrenia.

Edit: Once I'm used to commenting, maybe I'll edit less frequently. I apologize to anyone annoyed by this. I decided a more precise way of summarizing my response is a person can still be concerned about whether they have the capabilities to recognize the symptoms.