wedrifid comments on Dreams with Damaged Priors - Less Wrong

36 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 August 2009 10:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JulianMorrison 11 August 2009 08:58:05AM 0 points [-]

I don't call it near certainty because it would be awesome. I call it near certainty because it would be implausible given what we know for mildly superhuman intelligence to be impossible, and even implausible for it to be supremely hard, and because we are on the technological cusp of being able to brute-force a duplicate (via uploads) that could easily be made mildly superhuman, even as we are also on the scientific cusp of being able to understand how the internal design of the brain works.

Hugely superhuman intelligence is of course another ball of wax, but even that I would rate as "hard to argue against".