komponisto comments on Of Exclusionary Speech and Gender Politics - Less Wrong

62 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 21 July 2009 07:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (647)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: komponisto 13 April 2010 08:23:40PM *  4 points [-]

The negative reactions may have to do with the fact that such advice -- and indeed, a comment like the above -- amounts to accusing half the audience of a very blatant form of hypocrisy. Obviously one should exercise extreme caution when making such an accusation, and it had better be backed up with some pretty solid evidence -- to say nothing of the pragmatic considerations of whether there is much to be gained by voicing such truths (if they are in fact true).

Yes, lots of people probably don't tell the truth about what is sexually attractive to them. But if you go around saying "women are such hypocrites", it's understandable for a woman hearing this to take it as a personal insult. (If you didn't mean for her to be insulted, you wouldn't say it that way.)

Comment author: gensym 14 April 2010 04:01:29PM *  2 points [-]

What if you go around saying "almost everyone, whatever their gender, has poor insight into their preferences and responses"?

Comment author: HughRistik 14 April 2010 04:23:14PM 2 points [-]

I summarized some of the research on stated vs. actual preferences here. It seems to show that both men and women are often wrong about what they go for, but women may well be more wrong. However, I've only found a few studies like this so far, and I want to see more to feel confident about that conclusion.

Comment author: RobinZ 14 April 2010 04:15:51PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: SilasBarta 14 April 2010 05:51:18PM -1 points [-]

The negative reactions may have to do with the fact that such advice -- and indeed, a comment like the above -- amounts to accusing half the audience of a very blatant form of hypocrisy. ... Yes, lots of people probably don't tell the truth about what is sexually attractive to them. But if you go around saying "women are such hypocrites", it's understandable for a woman hearing this to take it as a personal insult.

An important clarification: it's not the hypocrisy per se that I object to, but its institutionalization, the massive failure to recognize the unqualification to give advice, and the tremendous benefits accruing to those who are "wise" enough to ignore women. See why that might be objectionable?

Obviously one should exercise extreme caution when making such an accusation, and it had better be backed up with some pretty solid evidence.

Okay. How about my life history, plus that of pretty much everyone joining the PUA crowd or identifying with its message?