Rather people are saying: "Hey men who know what women find attractive, you don't need to phrase your true advice in such objectionable language."

Really? Are we looking at the same forum? Because of all criticisms of PUA discussion, I never saw anything of that form -- most importantly, I don't remember acknowledgement that it is true (just as society in general won't admit it). Those who found it objectionable, like this characteristic poster, demanded much more serious straitjackets:

I would like help reducing the incidence of: ... Fawning admiration of pickup artists who attain their fame by the systematic manipulation of women. If it is necessary to refer admiringly to a pickup artist or pickup strategy (I'm not sure why it would be, but if), care should be taken to choose one whose methods are explicitly non-depersonalizing, and disclaim that specifically in the comment.

That's way beyond, "hey, use less objectionable language when making these true claims about what women find attractive". Don't you think so?