orthonormal comments on Of Exclusionary Speech and Gender Politics - Less Wrong

62 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 21 July 2009 07:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (647)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: orthonormal 21 July 2009 11:41:37PM *  2 points [-]

I second this; I think that a moratorium (for a month or two) on PUA theorizing would be better for the LW community than either a permanent ban or the continuation of the currently-entrenched battle on it, either of which would probably drive away a number of valuable rationalists. (Goes without saying that bashing PUA theories would also count as trolling during the moratorium.)

I want to see what the support looks like for this. Below is an informal poll: vote your preferred option(s) up and the karma offset comment down.

EDIT: You know, Vladimir has a better setup: take his poll below and we'll count them up after a bit. I'm deleting the current poll setup, with nothing at more than +2; sorry if you'll have to revote.

I'm keeping my "zero-boxing" comment, though.

Comment author: orthonormal 21 July 2009 11:55:27PM 4 points [-]

EXTRA KARMA OFFSET: If you voted two suggestions up, you can use me to equalize the karma effect.

Um...

I zero-box on Newcomb's Problem!

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 22 July 2009 12:51:00AM *  0 points [-]

Adaptation of comment voting to polls is awkward. There are free poll web services. Below is the same poll, implemented in the first service I stumbled on in Google:

Click here to vote!

Comment author: orthonormal 24 July 2009 12:15:45AM 1 point [-]

There doesn't seem to be a "view results" button, and I don't want to vote again for fear of screwing with the results. How did the poll turn out?

Comment author: SoullessAutomaton 24 July 2009 12:53:56AM *  1 point [-]

I hadn't yet voted. Having done so now, the results are:

  • 43%: temporary moratorium (28 votes)
  • 38%: no restrictions (25 votes)
  • 9%: restrict to a number of threads (6 votes)
  • 6%: total ban (4 votes)
  • 3%: a marvelous idea which this poll is too small to contain (2 votes)
Comment author: scav 23 July 2009 09:22:58AM 0 points [-]

OT: Nice poll. BTW - who is the other person who voted from Edinburgh?

Comment author: orthonormal 22 July 2009 01:14:21AM 0 points [-]

By the way, this setup seems to remove punctuation when graphing, which turns "1-2 months" into "12 months". (It keeps the punctuation when asking the question, though, so it shouldn't skew the results.)

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 22 July 2009 01:28:38AM 0 points [-]

Fixed.