thomblake comments on The Nature of Offense - Less Wrong

86 Post author: Wei_Dai 23 July 2009 11:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (173)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Pfft 23 July 2009 09:12:17PM 4 points [-]

To not raise the status of the pointer-outer, we could require that the pointing out is done anonymously.

To make it formal, it might be useful to make it part of the UI: rather than posting a reply in free text, you would click a "bad language" button and mark a checkbox for the policy you consider violated. Reducing the bandwidth of the channel in this way might make it harder to communicate elaborate moves in a social-status game using it.

Not lowering the status of the pointed-out speaker seems harder: one could make the whole exchange not publicly visible, but would a private message be sufficient to enforce the guidelines, especially since there might be disagreement about what constitutes a violation?

Comment author: thomblake 23 July 2009 09:42:09PM 4 points [-]

It seems that if you buy this policy, no UI change would be necessary. Just a policy of sending PMs rather than making it public would suffice.