Vladimir_Nesov comments on Freaky Fairness - Less Wrong

9 Post author: cousin_it 25 July 2009 08:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Sort By: Best

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 25 July 2009 08:47:37AM 0 points [-]

[The epsilon-dependent point] doesn't belong to the Pareto set

It does.

Comment author: cousin_it 25 July 2009 08:52:26AM * 0 points [-]

What? It belongs to the Pareto set of the competitive game, but not the cooperative game under study.

ETA: I agree that this point is pretty confused. Should I remove it?

ETA 2: removed.

Comments (36)