PhilGoetz comments on The Second Best - Less Wrong

13 Post author: Wei_Dai 26 July 2009 10:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 27 July 2009 05:09:43PM *  3 points [-]

I must be dense today, but I don't see the "phantom opportunity cost" connection.

Pareto efficiency is more reachable in game theory, where every agent is a party to every transaction; but not in real life, where you are not a party to, nor even aware of, most transactions that affect you. And a good thing, too; otherwise, we would live in a Pareto-optimal dystopia.

Imagine a world where every decision anyone made was subject to veto by anyone else. That would be a Pareto-optimal society.

Comment author: cousin_it 27 July 2009 10:09:48PM *  1 point [-]

Upvoted for insight, but this is wrong. Forbidding Pareto-bad transactions isn't enough to bring you to an optimum, you also need to make Pareto-good transactions happen.