jimmy comments on The Second Best - Less Wrong

13 Post author: Wei_Dai 26 July 2009 10:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jimmy 27 July 2009 06:25:35PM 2 points [-]

There is a large difference between "there are no more 'freebies' where we can make someone better off without hurting someone else" and "we will not allow a change if it hurts anyone at all".

The first is Pareto-efficient, the latter is a horrible idea.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 28 July 2009 03:03:19AM *  1 point [-]

Right, to demand a Pareto-efficient outcome is not to demand that all changes are Pareto-improvements.

PG is right to say that the society he describes is Pareto-efficient and awful, but it's not the only Pareto-efficient society.