GuySrinivasan comments on Pract: A Guessing and Testing Game - Less Wrong

5 Post author: brian_jaress 31 July 2009 09:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (42)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: eirenicon 31 July 2009 05:55:24PM 0 points [-]

Otherwise the game becomes one in which the object is to pay lip service to 'playing in the spirit of the game' while actually getting as close to the 'PGP encryption' ideal as one can without being unduly stigmatised.

I thought the object of the game was to have a fun contest in which you give your opponent a challenging problem and they do the same for you. Many games are broken, and these breaks are often called "exploits", for obvious reasons. Until it's patched, why not agree to ignore them?

Comment author: GuySrinivasan 31 July 2009 06:14:28PM 2 points [-]

Agreeing to ignore them is a patch. But unless you both agree to ignore them in exactly the same way, it's not a patch, and it's no longer a fun contest, it's at best just fun.