dumbshow comments on Why Real Men Wear Pink - Less Wrong

51 Post author: Yvain 06 August 2009 07:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (154)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: dumbshow 06 August 2009 05:22:53PM *  5 points [-]

| rich people have to buy sculptures made of human dung just to keep up.

This explanation of modern art seems incomplete. For many artists now, bleeding edge art is an exercise in "conceptual" problem solving and game-playing. (For discussion see, e.g., Kosuth 1969.) The economic forces described by Bell/Pinker do put selection pressure on which art gets distributed, displayed and, to a small extent, produced. But to describe these pressures without some reference to the noble and useful productions behind them seems to imply the common error of dismissing modern art as a bluff, a bullshit or some other mostly-useless activity.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 06 August 2009 06:30:40PM 1 point [-]

"Modern art is either a noble activity, or bullshit." <= If there is some noble and useful aspect to modern art, then this is a false dichotomy.

Comment author: dumbshow 06 August 2009 06:33:55PM 1 point [-]

I don't understand.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 06 August 2009 10:38:49PM *  2 points [-]

I'm sure there is modern art that is bullshit. There may also be modern art that isn't. (There may even be ways to look at a single artwork and say that it's bullshit on one dimension, but great art on another dimension.)

Comment author: dumbshow 07 August 2009 07:41:12PM *  0 points [-]

OK. I agree.

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 06 August 2009 10:36:01PM 0 points [-]

It follows that he thinks modern art is definitely bullshit.