HumanFlesh comments on Why Real Men Wear Pink - Less Wrong

51 Post author: Yvain 06 August 2009 07:39AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (154)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 06 August 2009 08:35:43PM 1 point [-]

One doesn't necessarily "sidestep fashion" by dressing conservatively. Desired lapel and tie widths change over the years.

I agree with both of those sentences, but I think the conjunction is odd.

There is fashion in lapel widths, but that fashion is, I think, for people who have to wear jackets, for whom jackets are thus not conservative. For such people, there are conservative (ie, low-risk) widths. For people who don't have to wear jackets, lapels may matter, but they'll matter in a very different way.

For settings where a wide range of clothes are allowed, there are options that are low-risk and slow-changing. These usually involve dressing up a little, but not too much. I think people trying to avoid fashion underestimate the risk, ie, the residual details that matter. Also, there's some other mistake they make...maybe overdressing out of confusion of different meanings of conservative?

Comment author: HumanFlesh 07 August 2009 03:34:24PM 0 points [-]

Which conjunction do you find odd? Is it the "and" between lapel and tie?