Jonathan_Graehl comments on Guess Again - Less Wrong

15 Post author: Alicorn 09 August 2009 07:11PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (28)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alicorn 10 August 2009 07:25:06PM *  0 points [-]

The amount of information added to your knowledge of the universe is large when a low-probability event is observed. This is "surprising" in the sense of number of bits it takes to encode.

I don't think it necessarily takes a lot of bits to encode low-probability events. If I take out the ten of diamonds and the ace of diamonds and have you pick one of the two, the probability of ◊10 is 50%; if I leave all the cards in the deck, the probability of drawing ◊10 is 1/52, but it doesn't take more space to write ◊10 depending on whence the card came.

Drawing the Battleship Potemkin out of Omega's jar would be surprising because it messes with the definition of Omega, who said the jar contained solid-colored beads. A boat (or a film, I'm not sure which you meant), which is not a bead, disconfirms the model of Omega. (Or the model of oneself as a an agent who can remember things Omega says.)

Comment author: Jonathan_Graehl 11 August 2009 06:41:03AM 1 point [-]

You may want to read about minimum description length.

Comment author: Alicorn 11 August 2009 03:59:20PM 0 points [-]

Thanks, I shall.