anonym comments on Misleading the witness - Less Wrong

14 Post author: Bo102010 09 August 2009 08:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (112)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jimrandomh 10 August 2009 12:27:33PM *  5 points [-]

Just because someone tells you that something has a 15% chance does not make it so. If someone offers you a 15% chance at $1M for anything less than $150k, then you should be 95% confident that they will try to cheat somehow.

Comment author: anonym 15 August 2009 06:00:54PM 0 points [-]

This is a really good point. I'd feel much more confident in these sorts of results if the questions were prefaced by disclaimers stating that there is no chance whatsoever of getting ripped off, that the random decision that determines the win or loss is absolutely guaranteed to be secure and accurate, that the $1M is tax-free, will be given in secret, doesn't need to be reported to the government, etc.