Expecting a chocolate bar that is "twice as delicous" to be worth twice as many hedons, is the same mistake as expecting 2X dollars to have twice the utility of X dollars.

Wow. I never said this. Not even "I kind of said this, and you took it out of context." I just plain never claimed anything about the hedonic value of deliciousness, and I never said anything about a doubly delicious chocolate bar being worth double hedons, double dollars, double utilons, or double anything. Moreover, this is unrelated to my point.

My point was that deliciousness isn't properly quantifiable. You don't know how many dollars you'd pay to double your experienced deliciousness, because you don't even know what that would mean. Omega can tell me that a chocolate bar will be twice as delicious, but I can't sample chocolate bars and tell myself which one, if any, was twice as delicious as the first. I have absolutely no way of estimating what it would be like to double the deliciousness of my experience, and if I did double the deliciousness of my experience, I wouldn't know it unless Omega told me so.

This is a very, very big problem. That I have never experienced multiplying deliciousness by a scalar and cannot imagine experiencing such is evidence that "twice as delicious" cannot reasonably modify "chocolate bar," or anything else for that matter. The same seems to be true of hedons; you'd need Omega to tell you precisely how many hedons you've gotten today as compared to yesterday. Obviously though, you don't need Omega to tell you if you have 20% more dollars than you did yesterday.