= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Warrigal comments on Deleting paradoxes with fuzzy logic - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (70)
That is in fact precisely what I mean by "truth value". What does "truth value" mean in your book?
Then what does it mean in fuzzy-logic to say "The truth value of 'Bill is 3 feet tall' is .5" ?
It means that Bill is pretty nearly 3 feet tall, but not exactly. Perhaps it means that for half of all practical purposes, Bill is 3 feet tall; that may be a good formalization.
I'll mention now that I don't know if normal treatments of fuzzy logic insists that truth value functions be continuous. Mine does, which may make it ordinary, substandard, quirky, or insightful.