gwern comments on When Willpower Attacks - Less Wrong

17 Post author: jimrandomh 03 October 2009 03:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (77)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 05 October 2009 07:39:25PM *  3 points [-]

I gave it a try one summer. Toward the end, it did sort of work, but my general conclusion was that you were permanently on a lower level of mental functioning (which seems to accord with Stampi's results). The experiences I read online generally either didn't have a good test of mental functioning available, or were focused on creativity - which I figure is something that could well be boosted by the slight delirium/loss of inhibition one sometimes experiences...

Comment author: pdf23ds 05 October 2009 07:43:33PM *  1 point [-]

Hmm. I wonder how a cost/benefit analysis would work out. On the one hand, you have a lot more time to make up for the mental deficiency, but on the other, small differences in mental performance can add up really quickly. (Anyone who has spent a day chasing a bug that would have taken them five minutes had they just thought a little more clearly will understand this.)

Comment author: gwern 06 October 2009 12:12:19AM *  1 point [-]

It'd be difficult to estimate. Intelligence is valuable; even the most basic minimum wage job can be done better if you're more intelligent.* And then there's the schedule disruption - more than one polyphasic sleeper has cited that as a reason to go back to monophasic.

So you want to be someone with a flexible schedule & undemanding job. A good method for freelancers, I suppose, or students (eg. GPA correlates higher with 'conscientiousness' than IQ; consider http://medicalhypotheses.blogspot.com/2009/05/do-elite-us-colleges-choose-personality.html ); positions where consistency can be more valuable than peaks.

* claimed in Murray's infamous The Bell Curve; I have no particular reason to disblieve it

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 06 October 2009 12:37:07PM 0 points [-]

[polyphasic sleep] did sort of work, but my general conclusion was that you were permanently on a lower level of mental functioning ... [other sources] were focused on creativity

One of the arguments for polyphasic sleep is that some inventors, like Edison, did something like it. Were they trading off intelligence for creativity? Also, you get more time immediately after waking up, which is supposed to be a good time to work.

Comment author: gwern 06 October 2009 02:02:50PM 1 point [-]