= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
UnholySmoke comments on Confusion about Newcomb is confusion about counterfactuals - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (36)
Props for the politeness. I would have responded (and was about to respond) by saying something like,
"Yes, yes, great point, Hal. Not ... necessarily a point you needed to make three times in a row ... but a good point nonetheless."
Three identical comments, all beginning 'Two comments'?
Head a splode?