Nubulous comments on Decision theory: Why we need to reduce “could”, “would”, “should” - Less Wrong

19 Post author: AnnaSalamon 02 September 2009 09:23AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Nubulous 03 September 2009 04:11:05AM *  1 point [-]

But if agent X will (deterministically) choose action a1, then when he asks what would happen “if” he takes alternative action a­2, he’s asking what would happen if something impossible happens.

-

would happen if something impossible happens.

But since this is the decision process that produces the "happens", both "happens" are the same "happens". In other words, it reduces to:

asking if something impossible happens.

Which is correct. Because the CSA deterministically chooses the best option, checking each action to see if it is best is synonymous with checking it to see if it is possible.