Johnicholas comments on Outlawing Anthropics: An Updateless Dilemma - Less Wrong

26 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 September 2009 06:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (194)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Johnicholas 08 September 2009 11:38:28PM 2 points [-]

Cute.

You may be able to translate into the language of "wake, query, induce amnesia" - many copies would correspond to many wakings.

Comment author: DanArmak 08 September 2009 11:51:38PM 1 point [-]

No, the dilemma depends on having many copies. You're trying to optimize the outcome averaged over all copies (before the copies are made), because you don't know which copy "you" will "be".

In the no-copies / amnesia version, the updateless approach is clearly correct. You have no data to update on - awakening in a green room tells you nothing about the coin tosses because either way you'd wake up in a green room at least once (and you forget about it, so you don't know how many times it happened). Therefore you will always refuse to play.

Comment author: James_Miller 09 September 2009 12:06:22AM -2 points [-]

But we don't have the type of amnesia drugs required to manifest the Sleeping Beauty problem, and perhaps there is something about consciousness that would prevent them from ever being created. (Isn't there some law of physics that precludes the total destruction of information.)

Comment author: Johnicholas 09 September 2009 02:25:16AM *  2 points [-]

I don't understand - what type of amnesia drug is required? For example, this lab:

http://memory.psy.cmu.edu/

apparently routinely does experiments induce temporary amnesia using a drug called midalozam. In general, I was under the impression that a wide variety of drugs have side effects of various degrees and kinds of amnesia, including both anterograde and retrograde.

Your proposal that consciousness might be conserved, and moreover that this might be proved by armchair reasoning seems a bit farfetched. Are you:

  1. just speculating idly?
  2. seriously pursuing this hypothesis as the best avenue towards resolving EY's puzzle?
  3. pursuing some crypto-religious (i.e. "consciousness conserved"=>"eternal life") agenda?
Comment author: James_Miller 09 September 2009 04:37:43AM 0 points [-]

My first comment was (2) the second (1).

If DanArmk's comment is correct then it isn't important for my original comment whether there exists amnesia drugs.

If your post is correct then my second comment is incorrect.

Comment author: timtyler 09 September 2009 09:20:27AM -2 points [-]

Microscopic reversibility prohibits any destruction of the information necessary to run things backwards - and that's all the information in the universe as far as we know.