= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
AaronBenson comments on Slow down a little... maybe? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (21)
It seems to me like that sort of restriction could lead to people disengaging from the community. Generally, people getting involved in Less Wrong (either through commenting or posting) seems to be a good thing.
Would it work to just let people know that only a small number of posts will be promoted in any one period and just let them decide themselves whether to therefore wait to post later?
That makes a lot of sense. Anyone object to that?
If they are useful, shouldn't you be glad to hear objections?
I don't like it. Maybe you could give the submitters the option of allowing their post to be delayed in exchange for a better chance at promotion?
No, that's the policy that I was expecting.