SforSingularity comments on Solutions to Political Problems As Counterfactuals - Less Wrong

37 Post author: Yvain 25 September 2009 05:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (36)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Tyrrell_McAllister 25 September 2009 11:55:15PM 2 points [-]

But the greater vulnerability of children means that we should also expect them to be more clannish. They should be all the more eager to demonstrate their loyalty to a group, because they rely more on support from others to remain alive.

I've observed far more clannishness among children than political perspicuity. I don't see that there's much displaying of "wisdom apparently beyond their age" in need of explanation.

Comment author: SforSingularity 26 September 2009 12:20:13AM 0 points [-]

I've observed far more clannishness among children than political perspicuity

but what about the relative amounts in children vs adults?

Comment author: DanArmak 26 September 2009 12:36:06AM 0 points [-]

Of course children are more clannish than adults. But the "clan" of a child is that of its parents, not of its friends and peers.

Adults can move to a new clan, band together to start a clan or sub-clan, replace or influence a clan's leadership. Children are pretty much powerless and are tied to their parents' clan. If anything ever really threatens that bond, I expect "clannishness" to completely override other priorities.