David_Gerard comments on Sociosexual Orientation Inventory, or failing to perform basic sanity checks - Less Wrong

3 Post author: taw 16 September 2009 10:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (41)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: David_Gerard 07 June 2011 10:03:55AM 2 points [-]

I am reminded of a great paper, which isn't online:

Biddlecom, Ann E., and Laurie F. DeRose. “A Cross-National Study of Virgin Births.” Journal of Irreproducible Results 38, no. 3 (May/June 1993): 9-14.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 09 March 2014 10:59:49AM 2 points [-]

I am reminded of a great paper, which isn't online:

It is now. It can be found reproduced within a 1000-page screed of crackpottery here. Go down to page 211 (as reported in the page header) or 168 (as labelled within the document).

Comment author: gwern 11 March 2014 02:31:50AM 3 points [-]

Amusing paper. For those uninterested in downloading 100M of crackpottery (as indeed it is), I've cut out the relevant bit as a standalone PDF: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/85192141/1993-biddlecom.pdf

Comment author: ChristianKl 08 February 2016 03:36:31PM 0 points [-]

Money quote:

With this wealth of information on mothers, house- holds, and communities, we chose the time- honored and most effective approach for analysis: a huge correlation matrix.