Christian_Szegedy comments on Quantum Russian Roulette - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Christian_Szegedy 18 September 2009 08:49AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jordan 18 September 2009 07:05:21PM 1 point [-]

With a similar technique you can solve any NP-Complete problem. Actually, you can solve much harder problems. For instance, you can minimize any function you have enough computing power to compute. You could apply this, for instance, to genetic algorithms, and arrive at the globally fittest solution. You could likewise solve for the "best" AI given some restraints, such as: find the best program less than 10000 characters long that performs best on a Turing test.

Comment author: Christian_Szegedy 18 September 2009 08:45:11PM 0 points [-]

This is a very interesting point and somehow shakes my belief in the current version of MWI.

What I could imagine is that since the total information content of multiverse must be finite, there is some additional quantification going on that makes highly improbable branches "too fuzzy" to be observable. Or something like that.

Comment author: cousin_it 18 September 2009 08:47:31PM *  2 points [-]

Not likely. You're already in a highly improbable branch, and it's getting less probable every millisecond.

Comment author: Christian_Szegedy 19 September 2009 02:15:11AM 0 points [-]

We have seen in the sister topic that mangled worlds theory can in fact account for such information loss. However MWT has similar deficiencies as single worlds: non local action, nonlinearity, discontinuity. It does not mean it can't be true.

Comment deleted 18 September 2009 08:57:09PM *  [-]
Comment author: pengvado 19 September 2009 02:33:55AM 0 points [-]

Why would the information content of a quantum universe be measured in bits, rather than qubits? 2^1000 qubits is enough to keep track of every possible configuration of the Hubble volume, without discarding any low magnitude ones. (Unless of course QM does discard low magnitude branches, in which case your quantum computer would too... but such a circular definition is consistent with any amount of information content.)