Wei_Dai comments on The Finale of the Ultimate Meta Mega Crossover - Less Wrong

31 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 September 2009 05:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (101)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Wei_Dai 20 September 2009 08:49:59PM 2 points [-]

There might be a much more subtle payload hidden in the interaction characteristics of the whole group, possibly appearing only after considerable computing time.

Interesting. The fact that none of the group members mention this possibility is good evidence that it is true (or there's some other kind of hidden payload). I guess we should expect that Maria's world will be taken over by the Old One eventually.

BTW, have you made any progress on the problem of how much resources an FAI should spend on exploring escapes out of simulation? The last time I asked, you were still stuck.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 September 2009 08:52:52PM 0 points [-]

Reason for blowing up = Pascal's Mugging, still not resolved to my satisfaction.

Comment author: JulianMorrison 21 September 2009 12:28:33AM 0 points [-]

Hmm, you seem to wedge in general on paradoxes involving very large numbers times very small ones.

I know that my own heuristic is simply to refuse to multiply with very small numbers. This prunes the paradoxes but has obvious disadvantages. The counters "but, number of fundamental particles in universe" and "but, other daft things with similar small probabilities" feel like cop-outs.

Comment author: Peter_de_Blanc 21 September 2009 01:39:19AM 4 points [-]

Do you always refuse to multiply by small numbers, or only in certain situations? What do you do instead, then? How do you do your physics homework?

Comment author: JulianMorrison 21 September 2009 01:56:18AM *  -1 points [-]

Only in the context of probability since that is where the paradoxes are.