= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on The Finale of the Ultimate Meta Mega Crossover - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (101)
Reason for blowing up = Pascal's Mugging, still not resolved to my satisfaction.
Hmm, you seem to wedge in general on paradoxes involving very large numbers times very small ones.
I know that my own heuristic is simply to refuse to multiply with very small numbers. This prunes the paradoxes but has obvious disadvantages. The counters "but, number of fundamental particles in universe" and "but, other daft things with similar small probabilities" feel like cop-outs.
Do you always refuse to multiply by small numbers, or only in certain situations? What do you do instead, then? How do you do your physics homework?
Only in the context of probability since that is where the paradoxes are.