Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on The Anthropic Trilemma - Less Wrong

24 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 27 September 2009 01:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (218)
Tags: anthropic open_problems qti

Comments (218)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment deleted 28 September 2009 03:33:29AM *  [-]
Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 28 September 2009 03:44:39AM 2 points [-]

Banned for attempted top-posting of Geddes-standard gibberish.

Comment author: wedrifid 28 September 2009 09:22:33AM *  4 points [-]

Geddes-standard? I don't understand the reference. An unflattering comparison to the biologist?

Edit: Thanks for the explaination EY. (And my expressed contempt for whoever thinks a query trying to understand the reference must be punished.)

Comment deleted 28 September 2009 05:19:54PM [-]
Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 28 September 2009 05:27:41PM 6 points [-]

I'm terribly sorry, but I had to delete that comment because it used the name of M-nt-f-x, which, if spoken in plain text, causes that one to appear. He Googles his name.

Here was the original comment by outlawpoet:

Marc Geddes was a participant in the SL4 list back when it was a bit more active, and kind of proverbial for degenerating into posting very incoherent abstract theory. He's basically carrying on the torch for M-nt-f-x and Achimedes Plutonium and other such celebrities of incommunicable genius.

Now please stop replying to this thread!

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit