Psychohistorian comments on Why Don’t We Apply What We Know About Twins to Everybody Else? - Less Wrong

13 Post author: MichaelGR 01 October 2009 04:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Psychohistorian 01 October 2009 08:24:58PM 5 points [-]

The abortion claim was pretty well backed up by numbers; crime declines began earlier in states that legalized earlier, and crime fell by less in states where fewer providers existed. Moreover, the theory behind it makes perfect sense: higher capital investment (be it time or money) in children tends to lead to better life-outcomes; children who would otherwise have been aborted receive lower capital investment, either because their parents aren't ready for them financially, or because their parents don't like them as much.

Comment author: taw 02 October 2009 03:19:21AM 1 point [-]

I find their claim extremely dubious - abortion availability correlates with too many political and demographic variables for tests like that to work, and worldwide there seems to be no relation between abortion availability and crime at all.